Early 1.9 to 2.1 conversion - stop me if I'm being stupid!

Big lumps of metals and spanners. Including servicing and fluids.

Moderators: User administrators, Moderators

User avatar
CJH
Registered user
Posts: 3018
Joined: 15 Jul 2013, 06:51
80-90 Mem No: 12576
Location: Nottingham

Re: Early 1.9 to 2.1 conversion - stop me if I'm being stupid!

Post by CJH »

Ah, ok, thank you - probably rarer than the 'N' suffix in that case. But I'll add it to the search criteria.
"I'm a man of means, by no means....King of the Road!"

1983 Viking Xplorer, 2.1DJ

User avatar
CJH
Registered user
Posts: 3018
Joined: 15 Jul 2013, 06:51
80-90 Mem No: 12576
Location: Nottingham

Re: Early 1.9 to 2.1 conversion - stop me if I'm being stupid!

Post by CJH »

Inspired by the 112i logo....

Image

...I made my own :D

Image
"I'm a man of means, by no means....King of the Road!"

1983 Viking Xplorer, 2.1DJ

User avatar
itchyfeet
Registered user
Posts: 12427
Joined: 23 Jul 2007, 17:24
80-90 Mem No: 12733
Location: South Hampshire

Re: Early 1.9 to 2.1 conversion - stop me if I'm being stupid!

Post by itchyfeet »

112i is 112bhp injection?

whats 121p?
1988 DG WBX LPG Tin Top
1989 DJ digijet WBX Holdsworth Villa 3 Pop Top
itchylinks

User avatar
bigherb
Registered user
Posts: 2580
Joined: 27 Mar 2008, 13:50
80-90 Mem No: 5789
Location: West Kent

Re: Early 1.9 to 2.1 conversion - stop me if I'm being stupid!

Post by bigherb »

itchyfeet wrote:112i is 112bhp injection?

whats 121p?
Pferd?
1982 Camper 1970 1500 Beetle Various Skoda's, Ariel Arrow

User avatar
CJH
Registered user
Posts: 3018
Joined: 15 Jul 2013, 06:51
80-90 Mem No: 12576
Location: Nottingham

Re: Early 1.9 to 2.1 conversion - stop me if I'm being stupid!

Post by CJH »

That’s the Pierburg ‘P’.
"I'm a man of means, by no means....King of the Road!"

1983 Viking Xplorer, 2.1DJ

User avatar
bigherb
Registered user
Posts: 2580
Joined: 27 Mar 2008, 13:50
80-90 Mem No: 5789
Location: West Kent

Re: Early 1.9 to 2.1 conversion - stop me if I'm being stupid!

Post by bigherb »

Should be CAT for carb a toot :D
1982 Camper 1970 1500 Beetle Various Skoda's, Ariel Arrow

User avatar
itchyfeet
Registered user
Posts: 12427
Joined: 23 Jul 2007, 17:24
80-90 Mem No: 12733
Location: South Hampshire

Re: Early 1.9 to 2.1 conversion - stop me if I'm being stupid!

Post by itchyfeet »

yes but 121? I can't see 121bhp on the graphs?
1988 DG WBX LPG Tin Top
1989 DJ digijet WBX Holdsworth Villa 3 Pop Top
itchylinks

User avatar
CJH
Registered user
Posts: 3018
Joined: 15 Jul 2013, 06:51
80-90 Mem No: 12576
Location: Nottingham

Re: Early 1.9 to 2.1 conversion - stop me if I'm being stupid!

Post by CJH »

I thought about a 'c', but there isn't a standard symbol for 'carb' I think. Anyway, it's my little 'in joke' - it doesn't need to make sense to anyone else!

121 = flywheel power = 102.7HP at the wheels plus 18.3HP in drivetrain losses. I knew my post was too long.
"I'm a man of means, by no means....King of the Road!"

1983 Viking Xplorer, 2.1DJ

User avatar
itchyfeet
Registered user
Posts: 12427
Joined: 23 Jul 2007, 17:24
80-90 Mem No: 12733
Location: South Hampshire

Re: Early 1.9 to 2.1 conversion - stop me if I'm being stupid!

Post by itchyfeet »

So is this more than a standard 2.1 injection or are all figures published at the wheels?
If its more It can only be the cam I assume?
1988 DG WBX LPG Tin Top
1989 DJ digijet WBX Holdsworth Villa 3 Pop Top
itchylinks

User avatar
CJH
Registered user
Posts: 3018
Joined: 15 Jul 2013, 06:51
80-90 Mem No: 12576
Location: Nottingham

Re: Early 1.9 to 2.1 conversion - stop me if I'm being stupid!

Post by CJH »

I asked about that, and he said that manufacturers quote flywheel power, so it would be directly comparable to the 112 quoted for the injection model. One way to check I guess would be to check the quoted power for the 2WD DJ versus the Syncro DJ - if they're the same then it must ignore drivetrain losses. I don't know how accurate his measurement of drive train losses was though.

The cam is one possibility, the exhaust is another, but the explanation that the fuel is better atomised by a carb than by an injector seems feasible. I know nothing about fuel injection - are the injectors near the valves or near the throttle body? One explanation I was given was that the carb drops the fuel into a long induction manifold which is under high vacuum, in an airflow that is moving very fast, and this can atomise the fuel better than an injector that sprays the fuel (in droplet form) rather than atomising it. I'm only going on what was suggested to me yesterday, but he seemed very clear that it's not uncommon for a carburettor to perform better than an injection system.
"I'm a man of means, by no means....King of the Road!"

1983 Viking Xplorer, 2.1DJ

User avatar
bigbadbob76
Registered user
Posts: 1733
Joined: 07 Nov 2016, 14:41
80-90 Mem No: 15707
Location: Isle of Skye

Re: Early 1.9 to 2.1 conversion - stop me if I'm being stupid!

Post by bigbadbob76 »

Thanks for posting the graphs CJH. Great to see what effects what.
The venturi diameter stuff ties in with my experiences when I did my 600cc-750cc conversion on my bike.
The original carbs from the 600cc were smaller diameter than the originals for the 750 but once properly jetted gave me better mid range response.
This made for a better ride on public roads where flat out max speed is immaterial.
Accelleration was better in the 50mph-70mph range, right where you want it for road riding.
Using the bigger diameter carbs left it a bit flat low down in the rev range.
'86 1.9 DG, 4 spd, tintop, camper conversion.
Split case club member.

User avatar
itchyfeet
Registered user
Posts: 12427
Joined: 23 Jul 2007, 17:24
80-90 Mem No: 12733
Location: South Hampshire

Re: Early 1.9 to 2.1 conversion - stop me if I'm being stupid!

Post by itchyfeet »

yes injectors right by the heads.
Very interesting Chris, of course they can't measure flywheel BHP so they estimate transmission losses on a rolling road but VW mayhave measured at the flywheel.
1988 DG WBX LPG Tin Top
1989 DJ digijet WBX Holdsworth Villa 3 Pop Top
itchylinks

User avatar
CJH
Registered user
Posts: 3018
Joined: 15 Jul 2013, 06:51
80-90 Mem No: 12576
Location: Nottingham

Re: Early 1.9 to 2.1 conversion - stop me if I'm being stupid!

Post by CJH »

bigbadbob76 wrote:Thanks for posting the graphs CJH. Great to see what effects what.
The venturi diameter stuff ties in with my experiences when I did my 600cc-750cc conversion on my bike.
The original carbs from the 600cc were smaller diameter than the originals for the 750 but once properly jetted gave me better mid range response.
This made for a better ride on public roads where flat out max speed is immaterial.
Accelleration was better in the 50mph-70mph range, right where you want it for road riding.
Using the bigger diameter carbs left it a bit flat low down in the rev range.

A similar result then. I remember someone posting in an earlier thread about carbs that the air speed through the venturi(s) is important. I wonder if this is the key - up to a certain point the bigger venturi benefits by allowing more air in, but after a certain critical point a bigger venturi means slower air flow and less complete atomisation. It's a theory, at least.


itchyfeet wrote:yes injectors right by the heads.
Very interesting Chris, of course they can't measure flywheel BHP so they estimate transmission losses on a rolling road but VW mayhave measured at the flywheel.

Good point - I'm sure VW will have dyno'd the engine on the bench during development.
"I'm a man of means, by no means....King of the Road!"

1983 Viking Xplorer, 2.1DJ

User avatar
kevtherev
Registered user
Posts: 18830
Joined: 23 Oct 2005, 20:13
80-90 Mem No: 2264
Location: Country estate Wolverhampton Actually

Re: Early 1.9 to 2.1 conversion - stop me if I'm being stupid!

Post by kevtherev »

Brilliant work
What a bunch of awesome surprises.
Well done Chris. :ok
AGG 2.0L 8V. (Golf GTi MkIII)

User avatar
itchyfeet
Registered user
Posts: 12427
Joined: 23 Jul 2007, 17:24
80-90 Mem No: 12733
Location: South Hampshire

Re: Early 1.9 to 2.1 conversion - stop me if I'm being stupid!

Post by itchyfeet »

kevtherev wrote: What a bunch of awesome surprises.

I seem to remember you saying carb was as good as injection before but I nerver believed it.
1988 DG WBX LPG Tin Top
1989 DJ digijet WBX Holdsworth Villa 3 Pop Top
itchylinks

Post Reply