Cable/wiring rating

An alchemy of sparks, copper wire and earth

Moderators: User administrators, Moderators

Post Reply
kentishvanman
Registered user
Posts: 647
Joined: 27 May 2007, 20:48
80-90 Mem No: 875
Location: Weald, Kent

Cable/wiring rating

Post by kentishvanman »

Hi,
On the wiring at the rear of the control/distribution panel there are some short lengths of single core cable/wire. For example connecting the water pump switch fuse to the printed circuit. This particular one had broken off the circuit hence the water pump stopped working.
Have solved the problem by bypassing the printed circuit and all is fine.
There are no cable ratings given for these stretches of wire on the wiring diagram so how are they rated. Can they be compared to multi strand cable?
1987/8 Autosleeper, 1.9dg (Automatic) hightop. Petrol/ LPG

User avatar
Mocki
Membership Admin
Posts: 16964
Joined: 29 Sep 2005, 09:27
80-90 Mem No: 428
Location: Mansfield Notts
Contact:

Re: Cable/wiring rating

Post by Mocki »

Because of the smaller cross section area , single strand can carry less than multi strand , so if you replace with multi strand of the same overall size , you will be fine
Steve
tel / txt O7947-137911
👀
________________

1989 2.1LpgWBX HiTop Leisuredrive Camper
1988 2.1 Caravelle TS TinTop Camper 
 

kentishvanman
Registered user
Posts: 647
Joined: 27 May 2007, 20:48
80-90 Mem No: 875
Location: Weald, Kent

Re: Cable/wiring rating

Post by kentishvanman »

Hi
Mocki wrote:Because of the smaller cross section area , single strand can carry less than multi strand , so if you replace with multi strand of the same overall size , you will be fine

Thanks for that.
I did consider re soldering but that would mean removing the printed circuit plus other bits and then hot iron on circuit could lead to problems. My 'mod' works so what else can I ask for.
Thanks again.
1987/8 Autosleeper, 1.9dg (Automatic) hightop. Petrol/ LPG

User avatar
itchyfeet
Registered user
Posts: 12427
Joined: 23 Jul 2007, 17:24
80-90 Mem No: 12733
Location: South Hampshire

Re: Cable/wiring rating

Post by itchyfeet »

Mocki wrote: single strand can carry less than multi strand

Other way

BS7671 states you must derate stranded cables by 5% over solid of the same CSA.

unless I misunderstood?
1988 DG WBX LPG Tin Top
1989 DJ digijet WBX Holdsworth Villa 3 Pop Top
itchylinks

Pinkythelabrat
Registered user
Posts: 125
Joined: 14 Apr 2018, 16:11
80-90 Mem No: 0
Location: Glasgow

Re: Cable/wiring rating

Post by Pinkythelabrat »

itchyfeet wrote:
Mocki wrote: single strand can carry less than multi strand

Other way

BS7671 states you must derate stranded cables by 5% over solid of the same CSA.

unless I misunderstood?

I think you are right Itchy - if the overall copper conductor is the same diameter the multi core will inevitably have small gaps between strands and so will have less ‘room’ for conducting than a solid would.

Multi core are more flexible but less conductive otherwise all wiring would be multi core rather than the solid copper seen in houses.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

User avatar
Mocki
Membership Admin
Posts: 16964
Joined: 29 Sep 2005, 09:27
80-90 Mem No: 428
Location: Mansfield Notts
Contact:

Re: Cable/wiring rating

Post by Mocki »

Well when I was being taught ( many years ago )
stranded wire carries more current than solid wire due to lower resistance. ... Thus due to extra surface area more surface current flows , however there is a point when you are using uhf that the opposite becomes true , but at DC stranded carried more ....

Either way it’s a negligible amount at 12v dc
Steve
tel / txt O7947-137911
👀
________________

1989 2.1LpgWBX HiTop Leisuredrive Camper
1988 2.1 Caravelle TS TinTop Camper 
 

User avatar
itchyfeet
Registered user
Posts: 12427
Joined: 23 Jul 2007, 17:24
80-90 Mem No: 12733
Location: South Hampshire

Re: Cable/wiring rating

Post by itchyfeet »

Mocki wrote:
Either way it’s a negligible amount

agreed
Last edited by itchyfeet on 06 Aug 2019, 11:53, edited 2 times in total.
1988 DG WBX LPG Tin Top
1989 DJ digijet WBX Holdsworth Villa 3 Pop Top
itchylinks

Pinkythelabrat
Registered user
Posts: 125
Joined: 14 Apr 2018, 16:11
80-90 Mem No: 0
Location: Glasgow

Re: Cable/wiring rating

Post by Pinkythelabrat »

*hangs head*
I shall stick to chemistry...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

User avatar
bigherb
Registered user
Posts: 2579
Joined: 27 Mar 2008, 13:50
80-90 Mem No: 5789
Location: West Kent

Re: Cable/wiring rating

Post by bigherb »

itchyfeet wrote:
Mocki wrote: single strand can carry less than multi strand

Other way

BS7671 states you must derate stranded cables by 5% over solid of the same CSA.

unless I misunderstood?
Yes you did. Multistrand cables carry more current than solid core. The more strands for a given mm2 the more current it can carry. Don't confuse household electrics with auto wiring.
1982 Camper 1970 1500 Beetle Various Skoda's, Ariel Arrow

User avatar
tobydog
Registered user
Posts: 1380
Joined: 07 Mar 2009, 21:03
80-90 Mem No: 6484
Location: Near Saarfend, Essex

Re: Cable/wiring rating

Post by tobydog »

AC/DC :wink:
Knowledge is power
1970 CU

User avatar
itchyfeet
Registered user
Posts: 12427
Joined: 23 Jul 2007, 17:24
80-90 Mem No: 12733
Location: South Hampshire

Re: Cable/wiring rating

Post by itchyfeet »

bigherb wrote: Yes you did. Multistrand cables carry more current than solid core. The more strands for a given mm2 the more current it can carry. Don't confuse household electrics with auto wiring.

How does a wire know know if it's in a vehicle or a fixed installation :rofl

The derating in BS7671 is for bundles of cables for thermal reasons which I assume also applies in vehicle electrics.

The current capacity of a wire depends on so many factors including the insulation type and really comes down to thermal characteristics. too much current it gets too hot.

Steve has it right

Mocki wrote:
Either way it’s a negligible amount
1988 DG WBX LPG Tin Top
1989 DJ digijet WBX Holdsworth Villa 3 Pop Top
itchylinks

Post Reply