Late Bay CU Type 4 / T25

Big lumps of metals and spanners. Including servicing and fluids.

Moderators: User administrators, Moderators

Post Reply
blakeys80
Registered user
Posts: 92
Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 14:49
80-90 Mem No: 15374
Location: Stourbridge

Late Bay CU Type 4 / T25

Post by blakeys80 »

Hi all, I wonder if anyone with a little more engine knowledge than me can answer a question? I've seen a late bay Type 4 CU air-cooled engine for sale, (I have the same in my van). So apart from the obvious tinware and mounting bars etc, is there any actual difference with the engine itself? I'm asking because I want to eventually upgrade to 2.1 ltr, and could use the bay engine for this, and build it up as and when, then transfer it to my van.

Thanks for reading, Ross

1981 LHD 2.0l CU with Twin Solex setup.

User avatar
bigherb
Registered user
Posts: 2579
Joined: 27 Mar 2008, 13:50
80-90 Mem No: 5789
Location: West Kent

Re: Late Bay CU Type 4 / T25

Post by bigherb »

Main difference is the type of engine breather is a removable canister on bay engines and the exhaust ports could be oval or very late bay engines square the same as CU engines, you can't fit CU heat exchangers to oval port engines and you would need the CU fan housing. And the flywheel may only be a 215mm instead of the 228mm CU one
1982 Camper 1970 1500 Beetle Various Skoda's, Ariel Arrow

User avatar
937carrera
Registered user
Posts: 3599
Joined: 05 Apr 2015, 19:29
80-90 Mem No: 16333
Location: N Yorks.

Re: Late Bay CU Type 4 / T25

Post by 937carrera »

Didn't tappets / camshaft change from solid on the CJ to hydraulic in the CU as well.

Be more ambitious with all the work that is involved and go for a 2.4 :lol:
1981 RHD 2.0 Aircooled Leisuredrive project, CU engine
1990 RHD 1.9 Auto Sleeper with DF/DG engine

User avatar
bigherb
Registered user
Posts: 2579
Joined: 27 Mar 2008, 13:50
80-90 Mem No: 5789
Location: West Kent

Re: Late Bay CU Type 4 / T25

Post by bigherb »

937carrera wrote:Didn't tappets / camshaft change from solid on the CJ to hydraulic in the CU as well.

Be more ambitious with all the work that is involved and go for a 2.4 :lol:
Some late Bays had hydraulic tappets as well.
1982 Camper 1970 1500 Beetle Various Skoda's, Ariel Arrow

blakeys80
Registered user
Posts: 92
Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 14:49
80-90 Mem No: 15374
Location: Stourbridge

Re: Late Bay CU Type 4 / T25

Post by blakeys80 »

Thanks for the advice all. I haven't managed to speak to the owner as yet, but this is a photo of the engine, I'll hopefully get more info today. What I do know is its a CU code from a late bay, so it depends how 'late' I guess. At the very least I could use it for spares for my current engine. I'll update when I find out more [THUMBS UP SIGN]Image

Sent from my Moto G (5) Plus using Tapatalk

1981 LHD 2.0l CU with Twin Solex setup.

blakeys80
Registered user
Posts: 92
Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 14:49
80-90 Mem No: 15374
Location: Stourbridge

Re: Late Bay CU Type 4 / T25

Post by blakeys80 »

937carrera wrote:Didn't tappets / camshaft change from solid on the CJ to hydraulic in the CU as well.

Be more ambitious with all the work that is involved and go for a 2.4 :lol:
I've only recently got my unit so the current CU had to go straight in to the shell to get us up and running. A while back I remember reading a forum where someone had fitted this:

https://aapistons.com/products/vw-porsc ... 914-type-4" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;



Sent from my Moto G (5) Plus using Tapatalk

1981 LHD 2.0l CU with Twin Solex setup.

User avatar
bigherb
Registered user
Posts: 2579
Joined: 27 Mar 2008, 13:50
80-90 Mem No: 5789
Location: West Kent

Re: Late Bay CU Type 4 / T25

Post by bigherb »

That is not a bay engine, it is from a T25.
1982 Camper 1970 1500 Beetle Various Skoda's, Ariel Arrow

User avatar
937carrera
Registered user
Posts: 3599
Joined: 05 Apr 2015, 19:29
80-90 Mem No: 16333
Location: N Yorks.

Re: Late Bay CU Type 4 / T25

Post by 937carrera »

blakeys80 wrote:Thanks for the advice all. I haven't managed to speak to the owner as yet, but this is a photo of the engine, I'll hopefully get more info today. What I do know is its a CU code from a late bay, so it depends how 'late' I guess.

At the risk of being wrong again, the CU was only fitted to the T25, so what I think you are looking at is a CU engine fitted in a late bay.

If I am wrong Bigherb will put me right :D :wink:
1981 RHD 2.0 Aircooled Leisuredrive project, CU engine
1990 RHD 1.9 Auto Sleeper with DF/DG engine

User avatar
bigherb
Registered user
Posts: 2579
Joined: 27 Mar 2008, 13:50
80-90 Mem No: 5789
Location: West Kent

Re: Late Bay CU Type 4 / T25

Post by bigherb »

The CU was only fitted to T25's, but still a type 4 engine, (Bay type 4 engines where CJ with solid tappets or GE with hydraulic tappets) and so the CU could be fitted to bays with fitting the tinware, heat exchangers fan housing and alternator from a bay, But that engine has not been modified to fit a bay. The engine bay in a bay van is narrower so that CU engine is too wide.
Attachments
Dscn0794 640.jpg
Dscn0794 640.jpg (76.35 KiB) Viewed 1908 times
1982 Camper 1970 1500 Beetle Various Skoda's, Ariel Arrow

User avatar
937carrera
Registered user
Posts: 3599
Joined: 05 Apr 2015, 19:29
80-90 Mem No: 16333
Location: N Yorks.

Re: Late Bay CU Type 4 / T25

Post by 937carrera »

:ok

I'm fine with type 4 engine in the 411 and 412, then the CU, but until now the bay fitting was a complete void for me, I can now see what they looked like and I also found this page https://davidplanella.org/vw-bus-engine-codes/
1981 RHD 2.0 Aircooled Leisuredrive project, CU engine
1990 RHD 1.9 Auto Sleeper with DF/DG engine

blakeys80
Registered user
Posts: 92
Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 14:49
80-90 Mem No: 15374
Location: Stourbridge

Re: Late Bay CU Type 4 / T25

Post by blakeys80 »

bigherb wrote:That is not a bay engine, it is from a T25.
Bang on, Thanks. I did think the same when I saw it. I have know spoken to the owner who's confirmed its a CU, which came from a 1980 T25. It's complete, turns over but hasn't been in a van for two years.It turns over freely and has all ancillarys with it.
I know these engines are robust if well looked after, and having spoke to the person they seem to be genuine.
As the engine is a long distance from where I live, I am getting more photos sent over so I can guage the condition a little better. It's covered 87000 in the same van prior to removal.
I realise it's a vague question, but as I can't see it in person, what are people's thoughts on what I should offer roughly, as the person wants it out of the way?

Cheers

Sent from my Moto G (5) Plus using Tapatalk

1981 LHD 2.0l CU with Twin Solex setup.

Post Reply