Engine rebuild technical thread (not T25 but very nearly)

Big lumps of metals and spanners. Including servicing and fluids.

Moderators: User administrators, Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
937carrera
Registered user
Posts: 3599
Joined: 05 Apr 2015, 19:29
80-90 Mem No: 16333
Location: N Yorks.

Engine rebuild technical thread (not T25 but very nearly)

Post by 937carrera »

I am following a rebuild thread for a VW 412 over on the Samba, this is the engine that is developed essentially into the CU in the T25, and from there into the WBX.

The latest update covers cold galvanizing the head studs, cc'ing pistons, measuring con rod journal play and trial build to determine deck height.

This is a top quality build,from a guy with loads of experience, and well worth taking the time to read, as the engineering applies to all of our flat 4 engines.

I'll admit I do struggle adapting back to imperial measurements - and there's an interesting bit where the specs in the nearly all the manuals are wrong, the only one that is right is the Porsche 914 spec book. I remember finding a similar type of error in the Bentley manual for the WBX when I was checking my "unknown" engine

Have a read, see what you think :)

https://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewt ... 32#9006832
1981 RHD 2.0 Aircooled Leisuredrive project, CU engine
1990 RHD 1.9 Auto Sleeper with DF/DG engine

User avatar
T25Convert
Registered user
Posts: 402
Joined: 20 Jun 2009, 09:27
80-90 Mem No: 7819
Location: Chester

Re: Engine rebuild technical thread (not T25 but very nearly)

Post by T25Convert »

Thanks for that - I love projects that improve on original build quality...

I'd love to know the variation in performance and longevity of this over a more 'normal' level of build.
RIP - George - 1.9DG '85 AutoSleeper Trident - rusted away

George Second - 1.9DG '89 Caravelle

User avatar
937carrera
Registered user
Posts: 3599
Joined: 05 Apr 2015, 19:29
80-90 Mem No: 16333
Location: N Yorks.

Re: Engine rebuild technical thread (not T25 but very nearly)

Post by 937carrera »

at the risk of banking on about this rebuild, the latest update explains how he found out that the cases were bored off centre at the factory by 0.007" (or 0.18mm), which is what was giving a deck height difference one side compared to the other.

On an air cooled you can simply use different thickness shims, not sure if that is possible on a WBX. He might do something else :)
1981 RHD 2.0 Aircooled Leisuredrive project, CU engine
1990 RHD 1.9 Auto Sleeper with DF/DG engine

Post Reply